data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fe0ec/fe0ec25356168a75853473eea6d2e6ab0ad1f36b" alt="Ah papi papi"
If this device could offer some functionality that you think may be important what would that be? How would you use them? Or if you can think of one use which will be the most appropriate for you?ĭo you think such a device would be good for patients? Would you use with all patients? How would such a device help you in your own work? Is there a particular age range of patients you work with?ĭoes most of your work involve assessing patients’ mobility?ĭo you know anything about wearable devices?įrom what you know, what's your view of them? What types of patients do you come into contact with?
#Ah papi papi professional#
What is/can you describe your professional role? The findings from in-depth interviews are reported. The aim of this study was to investigate health professionals’ perspective of wearable technology and draw on the findings to develop a wearable system for OA rehabilitation. 4 We asked general practitioners (GPs), physiotherapists and orthopaedic surgeons their views of wearable technology and how they would use it in their practice. OA requires different categories of health professionals involved in its management. Since each device should address the complexity of a targeted condition, our initial focus has been the use of wearable systems in the context of guiding and supporting OA rehabilitation. Moreover, health professionals could assist with promoting acceptability among patient groups. Unlike patients, however, they possess knowledge and insight of clinical practice, which would be critical in identifying realistic implementation strategies. Health professionals, like patients represent a key user group. 12, 16 Therefore, we know relatively little about how these devices might work in the context of clinical practice. By contrast, comparatively scarce attention has been given to health professionals’ views of these devices. 11, 12 Recent research conducted to address this gap in knowledge has focused on examining patients’ preferences for wearable technologies. 12 Consequently, less attention has been devoted to users’ preferences. The development of these technologies has been largely driven by engineering requirements. 11–13 The uptake of these technologies is influenced by their intended use, perceived usefulness, ease of learning, success in early experimentation, right fit to a specific clinical context as well as user needs. 10 Numerous devices have been developed to date aimed at monitoring patient ambulatory performance for rehabilitation purposes, but their uptake and acceptance in clinical environments remains poor. These devices are designed to record quantitative data in a mobile environment, embedded in the user’s clothing or fitted as an accessory.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/07cc1/07cc1366258421b0f8cac103ae9838fc4cb80770" alt="ah papi papi ah papi papi"
#Ah papi papi portable#
7, 8 These portable devices could potentially enable patients to become more active in the management of their condition and fulfil their interest in personalised health information while also aligning with the current focus on patient self-management 7 as well as the need for more accurate objective measures of patients’ functions. 6 Recent advancements in health-related measuring technologies could offer new opportunities for delivery of rehabilitation programmes outside a clinical setting, allowing remote monitoring and feedback of key measures to both health professionals and patients.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/28f38/28f3849a7c3125d0020087a11fa24bdc1d985239" alt="ah papi papi ah papi papi"
However, the effectiveness of these protocols is highly dependent on supervision and compliance, which is often poor. 4, 5 For OA, guidelines recommend rehabilitation based on exercise programmes to mitigate symptoms and disease progression. 3, 4Ī paradigm shift in the management of long-term conditions, such as OA, towards self-management strategies has been advocated to reduce the patient and societal burden of such diseases.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eb7ce/eb7ce0e465f5c63b2f8e06f497582ee2d7409a8e" alt="ah papi papi ah papi papi"
2 The prevalence of OA is set to rise along with its economic burden both from direct and indirect associated costs, which are already high. 1 Eighty per cent of those affected report some degree of functional limitation and 25% cannot perform major daily living activities.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d5e82/d5e8293a797466e16203688db770b80d6e12f70f" alt="ah papi papi ah papi papi"
Osteoarthritis (OA), among other musculoskeletal conditions, is one of the most common causes of long-term adult disability.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fe0ec/fe0ec25356168a75853473eea6d2e6ab0ad1f36b" alt="Ah papi papi"